From The East...

 

...a compilation of the monthly trestleboard messages (2001 through 2003).

 

 

February 2003 - Wendy's Founder Dave Thomas * January 2003 - The Eye in the Pyramid * December 2002 - The Grand Artificer * November 2002 - The Life of Benjamin Franklin * October 2002 - The Taxil Hoax * September 2002 - The Pledge of Allegiance * June 2002 - Threats to Freemasonry * May 2002 - Fellowcraft Working Tools * April 2002 - Entered Apprentice Working Tools * March 2002 - Masonic Ritual * February 2002 - Masonic Charity * January 2002 - Mozart * December 2001 - Friendship * November 2001 - Jack The Ripper * October 2001 - 9/11/01 Terrorist Attacks * September 2001 - Brother George Washington * June 2001 - Master Mason Degree * May 2001 - Rough Ashlars Into Perfect Ashlars * April 2001 - Fellowcraft Degree * March 2001 - Lodge Web Site * February 2001 - Donating Blood * January 2001

Back to Home

 

 


 

 

February 2003 - Wendy's Founder Dave Thomas

 

Brethren:

 

It is inspiring to reflect upon how many great and accomplished men have worn the Masonic apron, all the more interesting when we consider the wide variety of fields from which these brethren have come. Though the 15 Masonic U.S. Presidents are probably most likely to come to mind, we should also recall that there have been and continue to be famous Masons in other areas of government, as well as the military, aeronautics, science, medicine, education, literature, sports, entertainment, and many other fields. One famous Mason from the business world, who passed away just a year ago, is Dave Thomas - the founder and familiar pitchman for the Wendy's Old-Fashioned Hamburgers chain.

 

Brother Thomas was a member of Sol D. Bayless Lodge in Fort Wayne, Indiana. He received the EA and FC degrees in April of 1959, and the MM degree one month later. He was also a 33rd degree member of the Scottish Rite and a Shriner.

 

Dave Thomas was respected throughout the restaurant industry as an innovator and pioneer, receiving virtually every industry award and many business honors. His road to success began as a restaurant counterman at age 12. Dropping out of high school, he later bought several failing Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants and sold them back for $1.5 million. A year later, he opened the first Wendy's (the name inspired by his daughter's moniker). Over the next three decades, he grew the business into a mammoth 6,000 store operation.

 

Thomas became a familiar figure to the American public through Wendy's successful TV ad campaign. He appeared in over 800 humorous ads, wearing a trademark white short-sleeved shirt and red tie. In a 1991 interview, he said: "As long as it works, I'll continue to do the commercials. When it's not working any longer, then I'm history." But Thomas was never entirely comfortable with his celebrity status. In actuality, he was very self-effacing, taking considerable pains to remind those who knew him that he was "just a hamburger cook".

 

Though he achieved great success, he apparently did not forget his Masonic obligation to charity. An adopted child himself, he formed the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption, whose mission was (and still is) to find permanent homes for thousands of children under foster care. And he maintained the pride in Masonry shared by his brethren, once saying: "I believe Masonry is the cornerstone of America today. It brings good people together for a common cause - helping others."

 

Upon his passing, Wendy's corporate office had this to say: "Dave was much more than Wendy's founder and senior spokesperson. He was a mentor to many hundreds of people he personally helped and thousands who have been inspired by his leadership. He was loved throughout the Wendy's family as a perfect example of how really good guys can finish first."

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller, P.M.

Junior Warden 

 TOP

 

 

 

January 2003 - The Eye in the Pyramid

 

Brethren:

 

This past summer, I was on a trip to Florence, Italy, and visited the famous Uffizi Gallery, one of the oldest museums in the world. One painting in this museum that particularly caught my interest was that by the artist Pontormo entitled 'The Supper at Emmaus' (1525), depicting the events as described in Luke 24:13-35. This work - done almost two centuries before the emergence of Masonry as we know it - intrigued me because it included the famous 'All-Seeing Eye' symbol, one that we all know from the Master Mason degree ritual. In the painting, the eye was depicted within a triangle above the head of Christ.

 

The 'All-Seeing Eye' has been in the news lately. In response to the September 11th terrorist attacks, the U.S. Government recently established the Information Awareness Office (or IAO), under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the central research and development organization for the U.S. Department of Defense. The purpose of the IAO is to implement what is known as 'Total Information Awareness' – the integration of information technologies for extracting data on the activities of terrorists, to detect and understand their plans, and to prevent them from being executed. The IAO has chosen as their logo a figure of the ‘All-Seeing Eye’ on top of an unfinished pyramid, from which light beams project over an image of the world. This ‘Eye in the Pyramid’ symbol is the very same image that appears in the Great Seal of the United States and on the backside of the dollar bill. Because it appears on these objects, conspiracy theorists have often pointed to this as ‘evidence’ of a Masonic conspiracy to control the United States. With the introduction of this same symbol in a logo for a government agency whose mission is surveillance, conspiracy theorists take this as proof positive that Masonry is set to ‘take over’ the world.

 

The problem with this whole equation - and even many Freemasons are not aware of this fact - is that the ‘Eye in the Pyramid’ is not now, nor has it ever been, a Masonic symbol! The ‘All-Seeing Eye’, sometimes called the ‘Eye of Providence’, is an ancient and easily comprehended symbol of Deity for many cultures. Sometimes it was depicted in clouds; at others, as in the case of the Pontormo work described above, it was in a triangle, denoting the Christian concept of the Holy Trinity.  It can be linked to a number of passages in the Great Light, such as: “The eyes of the LORD are upon the righteous, and his ears are open unto their cry.” (Psalm 34:15); “Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep.” (Psalm 121:4); and “The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good” (Proverbs 15:3). It reminds us that the Creator sees all, knows all, and controls all things.

 

But as noted by Masonic author Brent S. Morris, while the 'All-Seeing Eye' is part of Masonry, the Great Seal of the United States is not a Masonic emblem, nor does the seal contain ‘hidden’ Masonic symbols. The first official use and definition of the ‘All-Seeing Eye’ as a Masonic symbol occurred 14 years after Congress adopted the symbol for the U.S. Great Seal. The 'All-Seeing Eye' first appeared as a Masonic symbol in the 1797 "Freemasons Monitor" of Thomas Smith Webb (1771 -1819), who did NOT depict the eye in a triangle or on a pyramid, but rather had shown it surrounded by a semicircular glory. 

 

On July 4th, 1776, the newly formed United States of America established a committee with the charge of designing a national seal. The committee's members included Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Pierre Du Simitiere, an artist. Of these, only Franklin was a Mason, and he contributed nothing of a Masonic nature to the design. Du Simitiere, a non-Mason, was a collector of art books and was familiar with the artistic and ornamental devices used in Renaissance art. It was he who included the ‘Eye of Providence’ in a triangle within the Great Seal, as this was a well-established artistic convention of the ubiquitous Deity.

 

But Congress did not approve the suggestions of the 1776 committee, nor did it accept those of a second committee in 1780. It was only after a third committee produced a design in 1782, borrowing from earlier designs - including the eye over the unfinished pyramid - did Congress finally approve the U.S. Great Seal. None of the Great Seal's final designers were Masons.

 

In the U.S. Great Seal, the pyramid signifies strength and duration. The eye over it alludes to the many interpositions of Providence in favor of the American cause. The pyramid has never been a Masonic symbol. It has no generally accepted meaning, except perhaps permanence or mystery. Thus, the combination of the eye overlooking an unfinished pyramid is a uniquely American symbol, and should be interpreted as such; it is not Masonic.

 

In short, the only possible Masonic design element on the U.S. Great Seal is the ‘All-Seeing Eye’, and this was a rather recent addition to Masonic symbolism. The eye became a popular Masonic decorative device in the latter half of the 18th century as an artistic representation of the omniscience of God. Only toward the end of the 18th century did Masons officially use it, and this was after the U.S. Congress had adopted the Great Seal. Thus, rather than Masonry dictating the design of the U.S. Great Seal, both the Great Seal and Masonic symbolism emerged out of the same cultural milieu.

 

Yet in spite of the misunderstandings surrounding it, the important point to remember is that the 'All-Seeing Eye' remains to Freemasons a cherished, revered, and universally appreciated symbol. In the third degree ritual, we learn that the eye is associated with control of the sun, moon, stars, and comets, and that it “penetrates the inmost recesses of the human Heart, and will judge us according to our merits”.  It reminds us of an omnipresent, all-knowing, all-powerful God who sees all. And it speaks of His mercy, for "to see all is to know all; to know all is to understand all; to understand all is to forgive all."  Thus we learn from Freemasonry this comforting realization of Him who stands as the final judge of erring man.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller, P.M. 

Junior Warden

TOP

 

 

 

December 2002 - The Grand Artificer

 

Brethren:

 

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." (Hamlet, Act I, Scene V).

 

The first of The Ancient Charges and Regulations, adopted by the Grand Lodge of England in 1722, states the following: "A Mason is obliged by his tenure to obey the Moral Law, and if he rightly understands the art he will never be a stupid atheist or an irreligious libertine".  Though these appear to be rather harsh words, it is as if the author(s) of the charge had the following passage in mind: "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." (Psalms 14:1)

 

Whether he employs a literalistic view of scripture or opts for a metaphorical view, in today’s world, it is typically the believer who is put on the defensive to explain his thinking, as if it were somehow incumbent upon him to have an answer for every question. It is the believer who is often accused of being dogmatic, narrow-minded, or worse - the implication being that those who maintain an agnostic or atheistic point of view are in some way "open-minded". Moreover, a believer's failure to provide complete explanations to all questions is often mistakenly viewed as vindication or support for the position of the atheist.

 

Yet while one can read many volumes written by believers in defense of their ideas, seldom, if ever, do we see avowed atheists elaborate upon the weaknesses of their own views, including their explanations (or lack thereof) as to exactly how, and why the universe came to be. Unbelief is rarely asked to think itself through, account for itself, or consider the implications of what true atheism really means. I once read an interesting essay entitled "The Difficulties of Unbelief" written by one W. Cosby Bell. The essay ruminated on what one must actually believe if he is to adopt an atheistic view of the world. Bell notes that the true atheist is, by his own logic, barred from explaining the world through mind, for according to the atheist, there is no grand intelligence or will. There is only endless, random change, without purpose or meaning. The atheist can offer no explanation for why the world exists, for according to his philosophy, nothing created it. There is evolution taking place, but it is mindless, without plan, and without intention. By the atheist's logic, blind random forces produced a creature which seems to think, and thinks he thinks, but of course does not really think; thus man is actually reduced to the level of machinery. Under the atheist’s assumptions, science, which depends upon the discovery of laws, cannot hope to learn the meaning of nature, for there is no meaning to be learned. Science is therefore reduced to recording and analyzing interconnections which may or may not hold in the future, for the mindless forces that produced our present 'order' may suddenly place them in disorder, putting science into confusion. An atheist must remind himself that there is no intelligence or design behind the structure of the atom, the gathering of atoms to form molecules, the complexities of DNA, the emergence of life, or the development of man - all of these are simply random occurrences, with no driving force or intent. Lifelessness somehow formed life, mindlessness somehow gave birth to mind, unthinking somehow created thought, moral indifference somehow created a sense of morality, and godlessness somehow spawned a desire to seek God. As for morality, what we call 'good' and 'evil' can be neither, for they are both products of the same mindless process, with seemingly equal value. Any sense of moral purpose makes no sense, for it was in no way created through moral intentions. Bell wryly points out that atheism leads not to any view of the world at all, but rather to skepticism, and that while belief may leave one with some unresolved issues, unbelief leaves one with far greater unresolved questions.

 

Recall that in the Fellowcraft degree, we receive admonitions and exhortations regarding the science of geometry. Why, of all things, geometry? We learn that geometry, the first and noblest of sciences, allows us to trace nature to her most concealed recesses. It is a deductive science, dealing with the properties of space, and the masses that occupy space. Geometry teaches us that the universe exists, moves, evolves, and lives, according to definite laws, or plans. Through geometry, we can explain the motions of a distant yet immense planet around a star, as well as that of an imperceptibly small electron around the nucleus of an atom. Geometry provides us with 'proof' that the universe follows laws so exact that predictions can successfully be made from them.

 

From these observations, we are easily led to a logical conclusion. Geometry reveals to us that the universe, from the macroscopic right down to the microscopic, runs according to 'plan'. But as plans cannot create themselves, there can be no plan without a 'planner'. Therefore, the universe as we know it was formulated by a planner, hence God. Essentially, Masonry makes what is philosophically known as an argument from design. The design argument states that the universe displays a staggering amount of intelligibility, both in the way things exist and the way they coexist. Even a single protein molecule is an object of incredibly impressive order, even more so a single cell, not to mention the incredibly complex human body. This intelligible order can either be the product of chance, or intelligent design. As it makes no sense to say that chance or randomness produced sophisticated intelligible order, the universe is therefore the product of intelligent design. Since a design can only come from a mind, or a designer, the universe is therefore the product of an intelligent designer, hence God. The unbeliever may counter such arguments by saying that the universe runs not according to plan or design but rather by natural law. But this provides no support for the atheist's position, for it does not explain who or what made the natural 'law'. In the end, the nonbeliever is still confronted with the ultimate question of how randomness and mindlessness happened to produce such laws and a creation that functions according to those laws.

 

Thus the seemingly unusual emphasis placed by Masonry upon geometry. It is a science that demonstrates the "glorious works of creation," the majesty and awe-inspiring magnitude of the universe, and the perfections of Deity. It points to the power, wisdom, and by logical extension goodness of the Grand Artificer of the Universe. Masonry’s primary teachings are of the Fatherhood of God, the brotherhood of man founded on that fatherhood, and the immortality of the soul in a life to come. As man is universal in his belief in the Great Creator, Masons accept such beliefs with open minds and hearts. Such is the true ‘secret’ of Freemasonry.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

November 2002 - The Life of Benjamin Franklin

 

Brethren:

 

I once read the following quote: "People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them Benjamin Franklin said it first." I cannot think of many persons, living or deceased, who have attained such a meritorious reputation. Born in 1706, and living to the age of 84, Ben Franklin had achievements in many areas, any one of which would have been enough to make him famous.

 

Ben Franklin was a printer. After an apprenticeship with his brother, he eventually started his own print shop with a partner. They published a newspaper called The Pennsylvania Gazette.  In time, Franklin was made official printer for Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey and Delaware. 

 

Ben Franklin was a writer. He created "Poor Richard's Almanack", which contained a calendar, weather forecasts, amusing stories, and jokes. It was here that Franklin coined such famous proverbs as: "Early to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise",  "God helps those who help themselves",  "Never leave till tomorrow that which you can do today",  "Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead", and "Fish and visitors smell in three days". At 10,000 copies, only the Bible exceeded its circulation.

 

Ben Franklin was a scholar. In curious contradiction to the "Early to bed..." saying, he studied late every night, immersing himself in mathematics, navigation, grammar, science, languages, and the classics. He amazed scientists with his famous kite experiment that showed lightening to be an electrical discharge. He conducted many other electrical experiments, and published a book forming the basis of modern electrical theory.  He conducted measurements of ocean currents and water temperatures. Yale, Harvard, Oxford, and other colleges awarded him with honorary degrees. He was a Fellow of the Royal Society in England (was awarded its Copley Medal), and was elected to the Royal Academy of Science in Paris. In 1727, he organized a debating club called the 'Junto', which later became the American Philosophical Society.

 

Ben Franklin was an inventor. One of his first inventions was a set of paddles to increase swimming speed (he was also an outstanding swimmer).  His most famous invention was the Franklin Stove, which he refused to patent, as he wanted it to be made cheaply so that all could attain one - indeed, Franklin patented none of his ideas. The Franklin Stove is still used today. Other Franklin creations include the bifocals, the flexible urinary catheter, watertight bulkheads on ships, the lightning rod, the odometer, and a device for getting books down from high shelves.

 

Ben Franklin was a musician. He played the violin, harp, and guitar. He designed and built the glass armonica, an instrument played by touching the edge of spinning glass. It's unique tones appealed to many, including Mozart and Beethoven.

 

Ben Franklin was an economist. A firm believer in the idea that the only true way to wealth was through hard work, his philosophies became the soul of the "American Dream" and the foundation for our economic system. He helped establish paper currency, and his portrait appears on today's $100 bill.

 

Ben Franklin was a public official. In 1737, he was appointed Deputy Postmaster at Philadelphia, and eventually became Deputy Postmaster General for the 13 Colonies. He created a special bookkeeping system, hired more postmen, and increased their sense of importance regarding their positions. Under Franklin, letter delivery between towns during winter months increased from only twice per season to weekly.  He soon made the postal service profitable for the first time. Franklin helped found the Philadelphia Library in 1731. He was Clerk of the Pennsylvania Assembly, served on the Philadelphia Council, and later served as a City Alderman. He helped to establish what is now the University of Pennsylvania. He helped found the Pennsylvania Hospital in 1751, and was made its president four years later. He formed Philadelphia's first volunteer fire company. At his insistence, Philadelphia's streets were paved, and were kept cleaner and better lit.

 

Ben Franklin was a military leader. Concerned about danger from Indians, in 1748 he organized volunteer soldiers and guns along the Delaware River. When British troops landed in Virginia in 1755, he hired wagons to carry their supplies. He was sent to the frontier to direct the building of forts and to raise troops. In 1775, he was one of three who conferred with Washington on problems of the Continental Army.

 

Ben Franklin was a statesman. The Assemblies of Pennsylvania, Georgia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts appointed him Agent in England.  He eventually became President of the Pennsylvania Assembly, a post equivalent to that of governor. He persuaded the English to repeal the hated Stamp Act. He proposed a "Plan of Union", and helped draft both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But he maintained perspective on America's newly established liberties. He once said: "The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself." In 1778, Franklin was appointed Minister Plenipotentiary to the Court of France, and convinced the French to provide much needed aid to the Colonies during the Revolutionary War. In 1781, he helped negotiate peace with Britain, and was a signer of the peace treaty.

 

And Ben Franklin was a Freemason. He joined St. John's Lodge in Philadelphia in 1731. A year later, he became Junior Grand Warden, and two years later Grand Master of Pennsylvania. He played a prominent role in the building and dedication of "Freemason's Lodge" in Philadelphia, the first Masonic building in America. He participated in the initiation and later the Masonic funeral of the French philosopher Francois Voltaire.

 

Franklin spent his last years writing letters, newspaper articles, and an autobiography. Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and other important Americans often came to call at his home. His last public act was to sign a memorial as president of a slavery abolitionist society, a noble finale to the well-spent life of one of the greatest men and Freemasons produced by this or any other nation. 

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

October 2002 - The Taxil Hoax

 

 

Brethren:

 

The weekly news magazine U.S. News and World Report recently ran a special issue entitled "The Art of the Hoax" (August 26th, 2002), which contains a series of articles on famous and infamous scams, deceptions, swindles and outrageous gags that have been successfully perpetrated on a gullible public one time or another. Included in the piece are accounts of such well-known deceptions as the 1919 'Ponzi Scheme' that bilked tens of thousands of investors, the fictitious army created under General George Patton in order to trick the German army during World War II, and the New York Sun newspaper's 1835 headlines about life on the moon.

 

A particularly intriguing piece within the U.S. News feature is an article entitled "Devil in a red fez: The lie about the Freemasons lives on". It describes how one Leo Taxil - financial schemer, pornographer, forger - wrote a number of bogus exposes accusing Freemasons of being Satanists. This is the first instance in which I have ever seen a major media publication come to the defense of Freemasonry and put its critics in perspective, and I have to say that it's about time! 

 

For his "evidence", Taxil created a damning counterfeit document supposedly written by Freemason Albert Pike. The hoax spawned a wave of anti-Masonic fervor that lingers on to this very day. Who was Albert Pike, what did he say, and how did this Taxil misquote him? 

 

Albert Pike (1809-91) was a lawyer, writer, poet, philosopher, and a general in the army of the Confederacy during the Civil War, as well as a Freemason. He was the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of Scottish Rite, which covers thirty-five southern and western states. It was once said that Pike "found Scottish Rite Masonry in a hovel and left it in a palace."  He had a profound influence not only on the Scottish Rite but on all of Freemasonry as well, though it should be noted that he was never a Grand Master, and never a spokesman for the entire Craft, nor did he ever try to assert himself as such.

 

As a Confederate general, Pike commanded a group of American Indians, and came to understand and respect their religious beliefs. Though a Christian himself, Pike developed an interest in the philosophical systems and religions of a variety of ancient cultures, and how these religions shaped the thinking and codes of morality for people from around the world. Pike believed this knowledge gave him a broader understanding of all humankind. Even though many of these ancient religions were long dead, he was convinced that they had made contributions to later thought and moral systems.

 

Pike's goal was to educate Masons on philosophy and religious thinking through his own written works, the most notable being an 861-page volume entitled Morals and Dogma, first published in 1871. This book, while not easy reading, is an interesting treatise of comparative religion, organized according to the ceremonial dramas of the 4th through the 32nd degrees of the Scottish Rite, and heavily interlaced with Pike's own opinions and perceptions. Pike's work doesn't seek to identify any single religion as the 'One True Faith' while proving the error of all other faiths. Rather, his intent was to inform - much like the comparative study of world religions offered as a major field in today's colleges and universities.

 

Unfortunately, Pike was so steeped in his substantial knowledge of ancient faiths and philosophic systems, his book tended to make Masonry out to be far more complex and esoteric than it really was. Pike overstated Masonic teachings and principles with mystic interpretations and deep, arcane meanings, so much so that the Scottish Rite's preface to Morals and Dogma (which Pike did not write), mildly criticizes Pike for going overboard, and explicitly states that the reader is free to reject and dissent from the opinions Pike expresses.

 

What most aroused the passions of anti-Masons, including those of the present day, is a reference in Morals and Dogma to "Lucifer", which Christians will of course recognize as the name of the devil, or ruler of Hell. Specifically, Pike wrote "Lucifer, the lightbearer!" and "Lucifer, the Son of the Morning!" Anti-Masons latched onto these passages as 'proof' that Masonry was Satanic. But in actuality, Pike was not using the term Lucifer to refer to the devil. The word Lucifer is derived from the Latin term lucem ferre, which means "bringer, or bearer, of light." Thus, while Pike might have employed poor judgment when he used the term "Lucifer", he had no sinister intentions, for he was referring to the morning star, the light bearer, the search for light; which is the very antithesis of evil.

 

Nonetheless, Pike's ill-chosen words gave Leo Taxil the ammunition he needed. Taxil created a hoax whereby he portrayed Pike as the "ruler of all Masons", and attributed to him a completely false quote saying "Lucifer is God," which he alleged Pike had said during a speech to Freemasons in Paris. By this time, Pike had been dead for several years, and thus Taxil was safe from any exposure or rebuttal. Taxil profited greatly from the hoax, and as an ultimate demonstration of his arrogance, he admitted in 1897 in front of a large audience that every word he wrote about Masonic 'devil worship' was a lie.

 

But in spite of Taxil's refutations of his own writings, has the truth prevailed? Apparently not everywhere or in every instance, for U.S. News points out that Taxil's work has spawned other anti-Masons to seek and write even more sensational accounts of Masonic-Satanic 'connections', and that this campaign against Masonry continues today. And even though it has been discredited for more than a century, anti-Masons still use Taxil's bogus quote of Albert Pike as 'evidence' of Masonic devil worship. Thus, not only did Leo Taxil deceive the ignorant over 100 years ago, but he deceives the ignorant today as well.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

September 2002 - The Pledge of Allegiance

 

Brethren:

 

In January of 1969, the late great comedian Red Skelton introduced his own special version of the Pledge of Allegiance on his weekly television show. Skelton, a 33rd Degree Mason and a member of the Shrine, was a man unafraid to show his love for his country, even during the turbulent and divisive days of the Vietnam War era. At the time, some had thought that reciting the pledge on his program might be risky, as Red Skelton was entirely identified with comedy and clowning. But Skelton insisted that he be permitted to make the presentation. The broadcast was a huge success, immediately generating 200,000 requests for copies. It was issued on record and was soon on the best-selling charts, alongside the hit songs of the day. It garnered 42 awards, and was twice read into the U.S. Congressional Record.

 

Skelton’s commentary involved a simple recitation of the pledge, with explanations of the meanings behind the words. He ended his presentation with the following statement: "Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country, and two words have been added to the Pledge of Allegiance: Under God. Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer, and that would be eliminated from schools, too?"

 

Brother Skelton could not have imagined how prophetic his words would become, for on June 26th, 2002, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a stunning decision in which they said that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the words "one nation, under God" essentially amounts to a government endorsement of religion, in violation of the separation of church and state. The case was brought by a California atheist who objected to his daughter being compelled to listen to her second-grade classmates recite the pledge, and who called the pledge a "religious idea that certain people don't agree with." The plaintiff added that no one should be forced to worship a religion in which they don't believe, even though reciting the pledge is voluntary. If allowed to stand, the ruling would mean that schoolchildren could no longer recite the pledge, at least in the nine Western states covered by the 9th Circuit.

 

A huge political firestorm erupted immediately after the decision was announced. The President of the United States called the ruling "ridiculous".  Senators, representatives, and governors from all sides of the political spectrum - Republicans and Democrats - voiced universal outrage at the Court's action. Critics asked whether the court's decision calls into question the use of "In God We Trust" on the nation's currency, the public singing of patriotic songs like "God Bless America" or "America the Beautiful", the use of the phrase "So help me God" when presidents and judges are sworn into office, or the fact that Congress begins each session with a prayer. Indeed, so strong was the reaction, that only one day later, the judge who wrote the 2-1 opinion moved to prevent it from taking immediate effect, to give time for the Court to reconsider its decision.

 

All Masonic communications, of course, include the Pledge of Allegiance within their opening ceremonies, and as all its members are already avowed believers in the Almighty, it is impossible to imagine Freemasonry ever calling for the removal of the pledge, particularly on the grounds that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected it. The salute and pledge to the American flag is as much a part of Masonic ceremony as is the donning of aprons.

 

Every member of the Craft is left with no doubt or ambiguity that his obligations to Masonry are secondary to his obligations to his nation. The Entered Apprentice Mason is told that he is to be a quiet and peaceable citizen, true to his government, and just to his country. He is told not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion, but is to conform with cheerfulness to the government of his country. It has been said that while a good citizen is not necessarily a Mason, an unpatriotic citizen cannot possibly be a good Mason. It is not at all surprising that throughout U.S. history, Masons have often been among our most outstanding leaders in government, the armed forces, jurisprudence, law enforcement, and other areas representing our nation, our values, our laws, and our way of life.

 

Although many legal experts expect that the 9th Circuit Court decision will be overturned, the fact that it transpired at all is nonetheless somewhat disconcerting, for in a way it reveals that while the pillars upon which our country stands are strong, they are not without unforeseen threats. It also demonstrates how some of us may forget the significance and meaning behind the great institutions and symbols of this nation. At Valley Forge, Brother George Washington said to one of his officers: "This liberty will seem so cheap to those who will not have to pay its cost." The September 11th attacks served as a shocking reminder that this nation has enemies both within and without, and that freedom can and does come at a tremendous price. Like the American flag itself, the Pledge of Allegiance is a symbol of our gratitude to God and to those who have sacrificed themselves for the freedoms we all now enjoy. As Freemasons, and more importantly as Americans, let us continue to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, inside as well as outside the walls of our noble fraternity, with sincerity, reverence, and gratitude. And may we never lose sight of all that it represents.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

June 2002 - Threats to Freemasonry

 

Brethren:

 

Will Freemasonry survive? Are we witnessing the demise of this great institution?  There is no question that the fraternity's membership ranks have diminished in the last few decades.  After World War II, a number of fraternal orders, not just Masonry, experienced huge increases in membership.  This peaked around the late 1950s, and began to fall off during the socially turbulent 1960s and early 70s. However, there are some signs that membership is beginning to recover in some jurisdictions.

 

It is important to point out that this is not the first period that Masonry has seen, and recovered from, a decline in its membership. Indeed, Masonry has survived far worse tribulations from whatever it may be experiencing today. Consider the history of Masonry in America up through the first quarter of the 19th century. Up to that time, membership in a Masonic lodge was almost considered a necessity for political preferment. Even though America in that era had frowned upon "secret" societies, Freemasonry seemed to be exempt from any such criticism, perhaps because George Washington and other statesmen of the Revolutionary War had been members.

 

But in 1826, public approval of Masonry suffered a sudden, dramatic reversal upon the mysterious disappearance and alleged murder (no body was ever found) of William Morgan of Batavia, New York - a Freemason who was planning to publish a book revealing Masonic secrets. Morgan was arrested in 1826 and charged with stealing and indebtedness, apparently as a pretext for seizing him. He was convicted, jailed, and reportedly kidnapped shortly afterward. Opponents of Freemasonry, including elements of the press, churches, and antislavery groups, joined together in blaming the fraternity for the incident, and this led to the creation of an Anti-Masonic party in 1827-28, reflecting widespread hostility toward Masons holding public office.

 

Suddenly, Freemasons were proscribed for no other reason than because they were Freemasons. They were spat upon in the streets, and barred from their churches. Children of Masons were excluded from schools. Brother was arrayed against brother, father against son, and wives against their husbands. Attempts were made to take away the chartered rights of Masonic organizations, and to pass laws preventing Masons from meeting and practicing their ceremonies. But the initial hysteria, however severe, was short-lived, for after the elections of 1836, the Anti-Masonic party declined in influence, and was eventually absorbed into what was known as the Whig Party. Nevertheless, the damage inflicted to the Craft during this period of time was devastating. In New York, for instance, membership dwindled from 20,000 to 3,000. Many members repudiated their obligations. Others remained as Masons, but chose to temporarily suspend meetings, close work, and surrender their lodge charters. But after an eclipse of almost 20 years, membership in the Craft began to grow again. Lodge books, supposedly long since destroyed, came out of hiding; charters reappeared; old lodges were reopened; and new lodges were built.

 

Another noteworthy, and even more frightening episode of anti-Masonry occurred in Europe during the late 1930s, 1940s, and into the 1950s, when the tyrannical governments of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and other despots resulted in Masonic lodges being outlawed, closed down, looted, and destroyed; and Freemasons being jailed and/or executed. By 1940, Grand Lodges had been eliminated in most of Europe, and there were many who wondered at the time if Masonry would ever be able to flourish in these countries again. There were incredible stories of Masons in Nazi-controlled Europe who would meet in secret makeshift "lodges" held in the basements of private homes, without formal charters or lodge paraphernalia, disguising their meetings as card games. They would discuss how they could help worthy brothers in distress, such as members imprisoned in concentration camps. But, of course, these dictatorships were eventually destroyed and/or ended, and Freemasonry once again exists in Germany, Austria, Italy, and Spain, as well as most other European countries.

 

The fact that Freemasonry survived the U.S. Anti-Masonic party of the 1800s and the European persecutions of the 1930s, 40s, and 50s demonstrates the resilience of the institution against forces that seek to destroy it. And while contemporary critics of Masonry (mostly from religious extremists) are not as organized, determined, or powerful as those described above, they have done considerable damage in their own way. Yet Masonry will survive these critics, too. In the words of Martin Luther King: "No lie can live forever", and no amount of lies, persecution, or violence can erase from this earth a high-minded institution dedicated to morality and based upon the principle tenet of truth.

 

Perhaps the worst enemy of Freemasonry today comes not from outside critics, but within. I am referring to the apathy of it members, and the effects it has on the institution. Yet I believe the effects of these forces can be overcome as well. For example, consider the following quote, taken from a book on Masonry: "Freemasonry's greatest problems are lack of interest in its teachings and attendance at communications. Many plans have been devised by Masonic leaders to stimulate interest and increase attendance, but few such efforts are more than temporarily effective."  If this sounds applicable to Masonry today, it should. But it is by no means a revelation, as those words were written by Howard Cruse, PGM, in the foreward to a book by Masonic author Carl Claudy, published in 1931. This is not to suggest that no efforts should be made to increase lodge attendance - they should. But my point is that in the 70 years or so since Cruse wrote of Masonry's problem of member indifference, the fraternity has seen much growth and decline, and my guess is that it will do so again in the future.

 

But suppose my prediction is wrong, and Masonry eventually dies from within, as Cruses's words hint that it could. Which, then, would be the greater sadness - the demise of Freemasonry due to external forces, or by its own members' apathy?

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

May 2002 - Fellowcraft Working Tools

 

Brethren:

 

Last month I spoke about the working tools of the Entered Apprentice Mason. In this trestleboard, I shall discuss the working tools of the Fellowcraft Mason, which are the Plumb, Square and Level.

 

Actually, the Fellowcraft Mason is already introduced to these tools as the "Immovable Jewels" described in the first degree, when the Entered Apprentice learns that they are worn by the three most senior officers of the Lodge. The Square, worn by the Master, symbolizes morality. The Level, worn by the Senior Warden, stands for equality. The Plumb, by the Junior Warden, symbolizes an upright life.

 

In the Fellowcraft degree, the working tools collectively represent advancement in the candidate's knowledge. The working tools of the EA are the Twenty-four Inch Gauge and Common Gavel, which one uses to lay out a rough ashlar and chip off edges, thereby readying it for the builder's use. But notice that the EA's tools only allow him to prepare materials in order to build; they are not actually used for building. The EA is only a beginner, thus the tasks he performs are those that will not materially affect the whole should they be poorly done. On the other hand, the tools of a Fellowcraft Mason are used to test and/or to put to use the work of an Entered Apprentice. The Fellowcraft is no longer a student, but a symbolic builder, and thus he is presented with the Plumb, Square, and Level, all of which are builder's tools. 

 

As the ritual tells us, the Plumb admonishes to walk uprightly in our several stations before God and man. Like most of Masonry, the ritual for this symbol is closely linked with passages in the Great Light, such as "Ye shall observe to do therefore as the LORD your God hath commanded you: ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left." (Deuteronomy 5:32). The Plumb is a symbol of rectitude of conduct, and impresses upon the mind the importance of integrity of life and an undeviating course of moral uprightness - qualities that distinguish those who are good and just. As it is unlikely that any wall will stand for long if it isn't straight, it is also unlikely that anyone who does not lead an upright life will be of help to his fellowman. Yet the ability to distinguish right from wrong is not all that constitutes rectitude. As the philosopher Confucius once said: "To see what is right, and not to do it, is want of courage". To live by the precepts of the plumb requires a considerable degree of fortitude, which is one of the cardinal virtues.

 

The Square teaches us to square our actions "by the square of virtue and morality".

What this is saying is that virtue should guide us all in our transactions with our fellow man, particularly with other Masons. One who deliberately seeks to cheat or deceive a brother Mason is not a really a Mason, as his words mean little and his promises are empty. Yet the question of morality is a difficult one. What exactly is moral behavior? For many, the guide for morality comes from one's faith, and this is fine for the individual, although significant problems emerge when trying to reconcile diverse religious faiths in a pluralistic world. Throughout history, many wars have been fought, and continue to be fought, over this very issue. Those who would adopt an immoderate point of view within one religious system will often roundly condemn (and, in turn, be condemned by) those who adopt an immoderate point of view within another religious system. The irony is that regardless of the degree to which one lives by the doctrines of his faith, it is utterly impossible for anyone to live a life that can be regarded by all human beings as "moral", as there will always be someone, somewhere, ready to condemn his religious practices, or lack thereof, as immoral. One can easily appreciate the wisdom of our Masonic forefathers when they instituted the rule prohibiting religious discussions within Lodge. Likewise, one can also appreciate the foresight of the founders of this nation, in particular President James Madison, himself a Brother Mason, who was most responsible for the form and content of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which addresses religious liberty. Madison once wrote: "The religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate." In the end, each us must decide what morality is and what it is not, taking into account his faith, conscience, circumstances, and the society in which he resides when setting his own standards of conduct.

 

The description that the Fellowcraft candidate receives with regard to the Level is different from that which he hears in the EA degree. Rather than the idea of equality, the Fellowcraft candidate is told that the Level symbolizes that we are traveling upon the level of time, to the undiscovered country from which no one returns. At first glance, this passage appears to be referring to the life hereafter, which no doubt it is. But it also can be interpreted from the standpoint of time management. No one can say for sure what tomorrow on this earth will bring, either good or bad. Tomorrow therefore remains "undiscovered". The passage tells us that the Mason can never unbuild that which is erected on the level of time, and as we learned from the Twenty-four Inch Gauge, time is the one commodity that can never be retrieved. Therefore, the Level reminds us to value our lives and to use our time wisely.

 

As we begin our Masonic lives as Entered Apprentice Masons (Youth), we learn and perform the fundamentals to be used later on. The working tools during this period are the Twenty-four Inch Gauge (used to divide our time) and the Common Gavel (used to remove all the vices and superfluities of life). They are designed to prepare us for the adult work that lies ahead. It is when we become Fellowcraft Masons (Manhood) that the actual work of our lives is performed, which is to be done by the principles of the Plumb, Square, and Level. And it is by these tools through adulthood that the Mason erects his spiritual temple.

 

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

April 2002 -  Entered Apprentice Working Tools

 

Brethren:

 

The working tools of the Entered Apprentice Mason are the Twenty-four Inch Gauge and the Common Gavel. What do they symbolize?

 

The Twenty-four Inch Gauge, emblematic of the twenty-four hours of the day, is meant to symbolize time or purpose. To all of us, time is of the utmost - the very substance of life. It always moves at the same pace, whether we like it or not, and whether we are prepared for it or not. It is the one commodity that, when misused, can never be retrieved, and we are constantly presented with choices that allow us to either waste our time or use it productively.

 

Throughout our lives, we are told not to squander food, water, fuel, money, and other tangibles, and most of us will try to live by these guidelines. In a similar manner, our language contains expressions reminding us not to waste time, and to avoid procrastination (e.g., “Time and tide wait for no man”, “Don't put off until tomorrow what you can do today”). But do we heed these admonitions as well as we could?  Are we more willing to part with the precious commodity of time than with other things that may seem to be of greater importance, but in reality are not?

 

You may recall the science fiction film entitled When Worlds Collide (1951), based on a novel by the same name. The story is a doomsday scenario in which two rogue planets enter the Solar System. One planet is on a course to collide with and destroy the Earth. The second planet is calculated to replace the Earth's orbit. A group of scientists and engineers begin a project to construct a spacecraft, so that a few individuals can escape the catastrophe and begin a new civilization on the second planet. But it is by no means certain that the mission will be a success, and their time is limited. They work feverishly on the project day and night, as the dreaded interplanetary disaster draws ever closer. Calendars are redesigned to remind the workers of the number of days remaining until the end of the world, and a sign is posted that says "Waste Everything But TIME".  The film shows us how time, and how one uses it, becomes the commodity of true importance, while things of a material nature that human beings have always treasured and defended with their very lives are revealed to have less and less value, ultimately becoming worthless.

 

The Twelve-Inch Gauge ritual reminds us not just to avoid wasting time, but also advises us as to how we can best spend our days in a meaningful way. It instructs us to devote eight hours for the service of God and those in distress, eight for our usual vocations or work, and eight for refreshment and sleep (interestingly, this bit of ritual was written long before the eight-hour work day became a standard). The underlying message is that time is a gift. It is up to the individual to decide whether he wishes to squander it or use it productively.

 

The Common Gavel ritual alludes to purity of heart, and our need to “divest our hearts and consciences of all the vices and superfluities of life”, as the ritual states. Part of the ritual for the Common Gavel is taken directly from The Great Light: "For we know that, if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens."(2 Corinthians 5:1). But it is also reminiscent of other Biblical passages dealing with purity, such as "The thoughts of the wicked are an abomination to the LORD: but the words of the pure are pleasant words." (Proverbs 15:26).

 

The Common Gavel is also a symbol of power, and how it can be used. Power can be employed constructively or destructively - once again, the choice is ours, and like time, power can easily be misused. As Lord Acton said, "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely". Our world has had no shortage of dictators, tyrants, and despots whose misdeeds have tragically demonstrated the truth behind these words. Most of the conflicts throughout history that have led to bloodshed and mayhem are rooted in struggles for power.

 

Freemasonry teaches us to use the Common Gavel wisely, not to wield its power arbitrarily or for our own selfish glory, but rather in the service of God and for the good of mankind. It is noteworthy that many of the Founding Fathers of this country were members of the Craft, and that Masonry, with its emphasis on brotherhood, freedom and equality, has contributed significantly to the development of the principles of democratic power-sharing practiced by this nation.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

 TOP

 

 

 

March 2002 -  Masonic Ritual

 

Brethren:

 

Masonry is highly ritualized; no one can rightfully refute this notion. To be sure, reliance on ritual is not confined to Masonry. Many institutions (e.g., religious, educational, military, governmental) use different rituals to varying degrees, though Masonry clearly is in a class by itself in this respect. Practically every word and physical movement within Masonic degrees and ceremonies is delineated and scripted, to the point where the Craft must hold monthly district meetings to ensure uniformity and exactness in delivery.

 

Masonic ritual serves as a source of considerable intrigue for many persons, both inside and outside the Craft. Some researchers and historians have made in-depth studies of our ritual in an attempt to find the hidden meanings and innermost "secrets" of the fraternity. For instance, a new book entitled Templar Gold by Patrick Byrne, himself a British Freemason, theorizes that Masonic ritual contains clues to the secret resting place of the Ark of the Covenant. Not having read this book, I am not in a position to state whether it veers closer to legitimate historical inquiry or to crackpot conspiracy theory. Nevertheless, its recent publication demonstrates how Masonry and its ritual continue to capture the imagination of both Mason and non-Mason alike, right up to the present day.

 

Hidden meanings aside, what is the purpose of Masonic ritual? The ritual is a teaching system by which the Masonic student is taught, and once he learns it, teaches others. Masonic ritual provides a link or common language that unifies all jurisdictions of the Craft, and maintains continuity with the fraternity's past.

 

Masonic ritual also provides Masons with their primary source of distinction. An organization develops in its participants a feeling of special kinship and identification. In Masonic ritual, a new candidate is required to voluntarily knock on a door and enter an unseen, strange environment. This requires a certain degree of trust and courage on the part of the candidate, as not all persons have the fortitude and self-discipline to take such a bold step. It is this sense of trust and courage that instills a special distinction within the Mason. I daresay that some of the more vociferous critics of Freemasonry may actually have a subconscious envy of the fraternity and a secret desire to join it, but decline to do so out of an unwillingness to face their fears of the unknown; hence their preoccupation with Masonry, and their urge to lash out at it.

 

Thus it is the ritual of the Entered Apprentice degree that gives Masons their first feelings of distinction. And by the time the candidate completes the Sublime Degree, regarded by many as a powerful experience, he cannot not help but feel a unique sense of enlightenment. But all this depends, of course, on how well the ritual is delivered. Badly-performed ritual will leave the candidate confused and/or uninspired. Sloppiness and poor preparation are bound to be revealed, even to the naive candidate. It is therefore imperative that officers of the lodge engaged in degree work do so with the utmost care, seriousness of purpose, and familiarity with their assigned roles.

 

Our rituals, based on ancient language and customs, have existed "without material change since a remote antiquity", as the Interrogatories tell us. Some may question why we let Masonic ritual stay in antiquity. Why shouldn't the Craft "move with the times", like everything else in the world? Consider all the many changes we have witnessed in our society, particularly over the last 30 or 40 years. We have seen changes in style, culture, social norms, population demographics, technology, scientific assumptions, architecture, laws, politics, and global alliances; we've even seen significant changes in religious thought and practices. Why hasn't Masonry joined this change bandwagon?

 

In my own opinion, we should be grateful that it has not, and precisely because so many other aspects of our lives do change. As the Masonic author Carl Claudy noted, Masonic ritual serves as the source book telling us where we came from, and when. Should it be altered, intentionally or by accident, the ritual will gradually lose its original meaning. The changes may not be obvious, but they would be there, and if allowed continue long enough, would result in the old ritual being replaced by something new.  The wise and virtuous men who founded Freemasonry recognized the eternal value of certain solemn truths. And despite the changes and advances in society witnessed even within our own lifetimes, men are and will continue to be born into a world rife with hatred, conflict, violence, corruption, abuse, prejudice, war, sickness, pathology, poverty, envy, avarice, deception, indifference, sloth, addiction, dehumanization, plus a host of other problems. The names and settings may change, but the problems of our world remain the same, time and time again. Because of this, the need for a solid, substantial, and unchanging system of morality on which to rely is no less important today than it was in 1717, when Masonry as we know it had first emerged.

 

Masonry's great emphasis on maintaining the exactness of ritual is rooted not in fear of doing "wrong", but rather with a concern with the ritual gradually losing its original meaning and intent. Our ritual is the heritage that connects and bonds us to Masons of the past, the present, and future. It has served and continues to serve as a norm in the midst of the pressures and confusions of life, for our Masonic forefathers, as well as for ourselves. It represents an unwavering standard of conformity - a "rock that abides". We must work to ensure that the timeless principals and truths given to us by our Masonic forebearers are not lost among ourselves, nor for those who have the courage to follow us through the inner door of the Lodge in the years to come.

 

Fraternally yours,

 

Eugene W. Muller

Worshipful Master 

TOP

 

 

 

February 2002 -  Masonic Charity

 

Brethren:

 

"Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." (Matthew 5:16)

 

There is a story about a little girl living in Idaho during World War II who was diagnosed with a rare heart problem that left her chronically weak and in pain. Her condition required special surgery at a hospital in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Because of military needs at the time, the Ann Arbor hospital had no backup blood supply. The girl's family needed to obtain 18 units of blood of her type on their own, else the girl could not undergo the operation. This proved to be extremely difficult for the girl's family, as no local hospitals or blood banks were able to provide that much blood.

 

The grandfather of this little girl happened to be a Freemason. Upon learning of his granddaughter's dilemma, he contacted his lodge brothers, a number of which in turn contacted brothers at other lodges and at the Grand Lodge. Before long, the grandfather and his Masonic brethren were able to line up the required blood, with two pints to spare. The little girl underwent the surgery and was able to live a normal life thereafter. Thus, this group of Freemasons was able to achieve what the hospitals and blood banks couldn't, and helped to save the girl's life. Fifty years later, she was exceedingly grateful to the Craft, and had expressed her thankfulness on a radio call-in program hosted by Masonic author John J. Robinson. 

 

This story is just one of the many great accounts of Masonic charity. The Craft donates over $2 million dollars per day through such outstanding programs as children’s orthopedic hospitals and burn centers, eye foundations, muscular dystrophy research, schizophrenia research, dentistry for handicapped children, homes for elderly Masons and their wives, substance abuse programs, and other charities. Yet most people hear very little about these programs. My own feeling is that Masonry should do more to promulgate its many significant works of charity, just as many large corporations do through very expensive commercials and advertisements.

 

But at the local level, individual members such as ourselves can do much to make a strong case for Masonry, for while our organization has a few "secrets" that we are not to discuss outside our own circle, this idea of Masonic secrecy is highly overemphasized by the general public. There is nothing prohibiting us from talking about Masonry, from identifying ourselves as Masons, or telling non-members in general terms what Masonry is as well as what it is not.